In a Rare Downgrade, Apple's Earnings and High Valuation Are Questioned

Apple Inc.'s stock may be becoming too expensive, prompting Needham to advise investors to proceed with caution. The investment firm has downgraded Apple from a "buy" to a "hold," signaling a more neutral stance on the iPhone maker’s stock performance. Needham analyst Laura Martin also withdrew her previous price target of $225 per share, which would have represented a 10.7% increase from recent levels.

‍

Martin cited three main reasons for her downgrade: Apple's premium valuation compared to its peers, growing fundamental challenges to its business, and intensifying competitive threats. In her view, Apple shares will need a major catalyst—such as a new iPhone replacement cycle—to generate upward momentum. However, she doesn't see such a catalyst materializing within the next year. Until that time, she suggested that a share price range of $170 to $180 would offer a more attractive entry point for investors.

‍

On Tuesday, Apple’s stock closed at $203.27. At that level, the company’s forward price-to-earnings ratio stood at 26, a multiple Martin argued is rich compared to other large tech firms. This figure is also about 50% higher than Apple’s 10-year average valuation, making the stock look expensive given its slower growth trajectory.

‍

Martin contrasted Apple’s performance in the March quarter with that of other major tech companies, highlighting a gap in both revenue and profit growth. According to her analysis, three other big tech companies covered by Needham reported revenue growth that was two to three times faster than Apple’s, and margin expansion that was three to twelve times greater.

‍

As a result, she warned that Apple’s current premium valuation compared to its peers may not be justified and could come under pressure.

‍

Another challenge Apple faces is competition from rivals with emerging long-term visions that threaten its ecosystem. Companies like Meta Platforms and Google are investing heavily in developing smart glasses as potential replacements for smartphones. Apple, by contrast, recently scrapped its own augmented reality glasses project, which could leave it trailing in the race for the next generation of consumer tech.

‍

Martin also noted the recent move of former Apple design chief Jony Ive to OpenAI as a potentially disruptive development. Ive was instrumental in the design of Apple's iconic products such as the iPhone, iPad, MacBook, and Apple Watch. His new focus at OpenAI is to help design an entirely new type of consumer tech that moves away from screens altogether.

‍

Martin speculated that if this new form factor resonates with consumers, other companies like Meta and Google could quickly adopt and expand upon it, potentially pushing Apple further out of its leadership position. She also expressed concerns that Apple may be too slow to counter this kind of shift.

‍

Among Apple’s current competitors, Martin sees Google as the most well-positioned to challenge the tech giant’s dominance. Google's strength lies in its Android operating system, which already has a massive global user base. In addition, Google has made long-term investments—over 25 years—in building advanced AI systems. As generative AI continues to evolve, it poses a serious threat to Apple’s ecosystem, which has been slower to integrate these capabilities.

‍

Martin also warned of increasing vulnerabilities in Apple’s core revenue streams, particularly its iPhone and Services divisions. She pointed to weakening global smartphone demand, driven by lower consumer spending and the effects of trade tariffs.

‍

At the same time, Apple is facing mounting regulatory and legal risks that could affect its business model. One notable concern is the potential loss of the $20 billion Apple receives annually from Google in exchange for making it the default search engine in Safari. If that deal is undone, Apple could take a major hit to its Services income.

‍

So far this year, Apple’s stock has fallen 19%. It slipped slightly in premarket trading after Needham’s downgrade.

‍

Despite Martin’s more cautious view, the broader analyst community remains largely optimistic about Apple’s future. Of the 51 analysts tracked by LSEG who cover the stock, 34 maintain a "buy" or "strong buy" rating, while 12 rate it as a "hold." Only a small minority are bearish.

‍

In conclusion, although Apple remains a favorite among many analysts, Needham believes the stock is currently overvalued given the company’s growth outlook and competitive pressures. Without a clear catalyst like a new iPhone cycle, and with emerging technologies potentially shifting consumer habits, investors may want to wait for a more attractive buying opportunity.

‍